Tuesday, October 9, 2007

What insight about change and decision-making do you see portrayed in the movie "High Noon"?


Of the characters presented, who do you identify with? Who changes in the movie and what does that character decide?

See over 100 reviews on Amazon.

See Wikipedia article on the movie.

See what others have to say on LinkedIn.

Enjoy watching the movie and thanks for participating.

John

"It's A Wonderful Life": Example of the Decision-Maker's Path




The first perspective I presented in my blog on High Noon was that of the hero’s journey. Because the hero’s journey and the decision-maker’s path are important to my approaches to helping people learn more about decision-making, in this blog I show how the milestones of the decision-maker’s path help organize, by a series of questions, the inner plot of the story of a decision. In my blog on High Noon, I addressed the way that movie illustrates the hero’s journey.

So using
It’s A Wonderful Life and Jimmy Stewart’s hero character, “George Bailey” as the decision-maker in this example, let me briefly suggest how the decision-maker’s path works.

1. Where are you coming from? George Bailey lives in the small town of Bedford Falls. The son of Peter Bailey, executive secretary of the local building and loan association, 12-year-old George saves his younger brother Harry from drowning. Saving Harry has the physical consequence of injuring his hearing and George becomes deaf in one ear.

Nevertheless, he is able to work in Mr. Gower’s drugstore where two young girls, Mary and Violet stake their claims on him, despite his early indication of his desire to travel the globe. Mary even whispers into George’s deaf ear that she will love him until the day she dies.

When Mr. Gower, overwrought with sadness at the death of his son in the war, nearly poisons an ill patient by dispensing the wrong medicine, George reads the all the signs (“Ask Dad – he knows”) and seeks out his dad’s help. But Peter Bailey is too busy fending off the continuing attempts of the richest, but handicapped, banker Henry Potter who is trying to take over the building and loan association. George defends his dad against Potter’s charges and then saves another family’s child by returning to the drugstore and responding to Mr. Gower’s mistaken accusations. Although Mr. Gower hits George on his sore ear, George shows deep Mr. Gower compassion, forgiveness, and a purity of heart well beyond his years.

2. Where are you wanting to go? So nine years later, when George prepares to pursue his dream of escaping Bedford Falls and traveling to faraway paradises in the world, Mr. Gower gives him a new suitcase embossed with “George Bailey” on it. George proudly walks home, carrying his luggage and meets with his family for one last meal before he leaves.

His tired father asks George if he is coming back to the building and loan association after his trips.

3. What are you waiting for? George wants to do something big and important and lead a different life than his father.

4. What are your wise ones generally advising? Rather than stay with his saddened father whom he belatedly admits is a great guy, George goes to his brother Harry’s graduation and high school reunion.

There Mary’s brother urges George to dance with Mary, despite the protests of another young man. When George and Mary see each other across the dance floor, they exchange looks of budding love across the dance floor. When George and Mary enter the big Charleston contest, they are so taken with each other and their dancing they fail to realize that the young Othello is getting his revenge by activating the device that splits the basketball court dance floor in half. George and Mary fall into the pool, followed by others and eventually even the principal in a display of spontaneous joy.

Once sufficiently dry, in borrowed clothing, (George as a athlete, Mary in a bathrobe), they make their way toward Mary’s home singing “Buffalo Girl, Won’t You Come Out Tonight?” (“…a dance by the light of the moon.”) George stops them in front of the old Grandville home. Making his wishes by the hatful, he successfully throws a rock through a window. When Mary accomplished the same feat, she does not reveal her wish. George, thinking she is the prettiest girl in town, carries on saying he would lasso the moon and give it to Mary if she wanted it. A neighbor, hearing this effusive offer, asks George why he doesn’t just kiss Mary. But when he tries, Mary turns and runs off. But George accidentally steps on the bathrobes belt which forces Mary to hide herself in a nearby bush. Though Mary asks for the robe back, George debates with himself over this opportunity.

5. What are the pros and cons of the issue being decided? But before he can act on his thoughts about Mary, word arrives that his father is suffering from a stroke. George gives up his trip abroad to help straighten out his father’s business.

At a meeting of the board of the building and loan association, Potter makes the case for closing the association now that Peter Bailey is dead. George makes an impassioned plea for them not to do so to save the townspeople from Potter’s miserly grasp. Out of George’s presence, the Board sides against Potter and agrees not to dissolve the association on the condition that George succeed his father as the executive secretary.

6. What are “The Powers That Be” saying? So while Harry goes off to college and becomes a football hero, George stays in Bedford Falls and runs the building and loan. The next time George sees Harry, Harry is coming home to present his new wife Ruth to the family and tell them of his plans to go work for her father. This dissolves George’s hope of Harry taking over and letting George follow his dreams.

Seeing Harry happy with his new wife, George’s mother encourages George to strike up a relationship with Mary again. George goes over to Mary’s house where she has “Buffalo Gal” playing and a picture of George lassoing the moon. George’s discomfort brings them to fighting words. When he leaves, Mary breaks the record.

Then their old friend Sam Wainwright calls. Mary’s mother wants Sam to win Mary’s hand, but Sam is only playing. When George comes back to retrieve his hat, Mary alerts Sam and Sam pitches a deal to him, a chance of a life time. But standing so close to the phone together, the power of love between the George and Mary becomes irresistible. They pull each other in and take another chance. (George’s “I want to do what I want to do” becomes “I do.”)

7. What is your real agenda? Their wedding, on a rainy day, is shortly thereafter. After the wedding, with a handful of saved cash, George and Mary head for their honeymoon and a trip to paradise, only to be stopped by a run on the banks and the building and loan.

Potter calls his loan to the building and loan association and Uncle Billy pays him all the association’s cash. Again reading a sign from his father (“All you can take with you is that which you can give away.”), George faces the shareholders and explains how their money is invested in each other’s homes and cannot be paid out. They must have faith in each other.

But it is Mary who saves the day by providing their honeymoon money to George so he can help everyone get past the bank closing. At the close of business, George takes the last two dollars to the safe in a mock bedding ceremony where he encourages the two bills to propagate overnight.

Then he remembers his new wife. He rushes to 320 Sycamore, the address where the rocks were thrown and their wishes made. Mary and their friends have decorated the walls with posters of various travel destinations. There, in the leaky home, he finds Mary waiting for him with a romantic dinner and the revelation that this home with him is what she had wished for many years before.

8. What facts and reasons are you contending with? So successful is George’s effort that he is able to help Mr. Martini move out of Potterville where he was renting a house and into Bailey Park. Sam Wainwright and new wife arrive to see this home warming and invite George and Mary to come with them on a car trip. But George and Mary know that’s not in the cards.

Potter’s advisor presents the facts of the growing attractiveness of the new homes. So Potter invites George to his office. Smokes cigars with him. Flatters him about how well he’s doing. Seems to know what George wants out of life and the trap that Bedford Falls represents. Offers George a job for $20,000 a year for three years if George will sell out. When George hesitates, Potter suggests George is afraid of success.

9. What insights and oversights are emerging? Then George shakes Potter’s hand. Feels something strange about it. Realizes he’s touched a “scurvy spider” and rejects the offer.

George returns home and discovers Mary is pregnant with the first of four children: Pete, Janey, Zuzu, and Tommy.

Throughout these child-bearing years, Mary proceeds to work on renovating their home. While Harry goes off to war and becomes a hero, winning the Congressional Medal of Honor, because of George’s loss of hearing, he becomes the air raid warden for Bedford Falls and the leader of the paper drive.

10. How are you going to tell your decision? On December 24, 1945, at 10:00 AM, when the local newspaper arrives with the front-page headline about Harry’s winning the award, George in contrast is confronted with Carter the bank examiner. In a celebrative mood, George jokingly tells Carter “We are broke” as they go into the examination.

Meanwhile, George’s Uncle Billy takes the $8,000 in a deposit envelope to Potter’s bank. There, while bragging to Potter about Harry’s award, showing him by grabbing Potter’s paper, he accidently hands over the money envelope to Potter in the fold of the paper he returns to him. Potter rolls away in his wheel chair and discovers the money in the paper. But he does not intervene when Uncle Billy can’t produce the envelope while in line to make the deposit.

George goes with Uncle Billy to retrace his steps, all the while Potter is watching. George, desperate, calls Uncle Billy a “silly, stupid old fool” because he can’t remember where he misplaced the money.

George goes home and comes unglued with the children, especially with Janey who’s practicing “Hark the Herald Angels Sing.“ He does accept Zuzu’s flower petals when she offers them from her sick bed. Then he chews out Zuzu’s teacher for letting her get sick. George even questions whether he and Mary have a happy family. But when he knocks stuff off a table, all know “something is wrong with Daddy.” He says he’s sorry but does not reveal to Mary what’s pressing him. His scaring the family has an impact. Mary asks the children to pray for Daddy. George leaves.

11. What are you willing to risk in order to gain what you can only hope for? George goes to Potter, explains the situation, and offers him a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan. George appears to be worth more dead than alive since his equity in the policy is minimal in comparison to the value of it should he die. Potter refuses and instead says he is calling the police. (”No help from a warped, frustrated old man.”) He tells George that the District Attorney and local reporters are looking for him.

George leaves and goes to Martini’s Bar. Drinks. Prays to his “Father in heaven” to show him the way. But when he is interrupted by the husband of Zuzu’s teacher slugging him for talking that way to his wife, George sees that as the answer to his prayer. (“That’s what I get for praying.”)

Drunken George drives off, runs into a tree, and then makes his way along a bridge on foot. At this juncture, 10:45 PM, on Christmas Eve, George is considering throwing himself off the bridge.

Up to this point, this entire story has been shown to Clarence Oddbody, George’s Guardian Angel, by an invisible person called Joseph. Clarence is being sent in answer to the prayers of the community who are worried about George’s out-of-character behavior.

Clarence jumps into the river. George immediately jumps in to save him. Drying out in the watchman’s office, Clarence not only reveals that he is an angel, but also that his strategy of having George save him was so that Clarence could save George in the process.

The bridge watchman notes that it’s illegal to commit suicide and Clarence agrees that it is illegal where he comes from too, meaning heaven.

Clarence says it’s ridiculous to kill oneself over money.

None of these arguments are persuasive to George. So Clarence tries another, asking George to think about what would have happened to people if George hadn’t helped them. George again is not persuaded. Wishes he was never born. Clarence grants the wish.

12. How do you determining that the decision you are discerning is the right one? Clarence then shows George what would have happened if George hadn’t been born and did not exist.

George would have no identity. There would not have been a car wreck because George would have not had a car. Martini’s Bar would be Nick’s, an uncomfortable non-family environment since George wasn’t there to help Martini. Bedford Falls would have been Potterville. Bailey Park would have been a cemetery. Harry would have drowned. All those he saved during the war would be dead because he wasn’t there for them. There would be no building and loan association and Uncle Billy would be in the insane asylum as a result. George’s mother would not recognize him. George’s home would be empty; no family. Mary would be an old maid librarian.

When George is overwhelmed at the thought of Mary not recognizing him, he runs from the police and cries out to Clarence that he wants to live again. Immediately his deepest desire is granted.

Nothing bothers him. George returns home to face the bank examiner, the DA, the Police, and the Reporters, but without a care. Then Mary arrives with the news that the community has come forward to help George out with cash donations that easily cover the lost money. Harry arrives to join the celebration and toasts George as “the richest man in town.” Sam wires that he is prepared to wire $25,000 to help George out. Janey plays “Hark the Herald Angels Sing” and George opens a present from Clarence. It’s the Tom Sawyer book with the inscription: “…Remember, no man is a failure who has friends…”

© 2007 John Darrouzet

"High Noon": Example of the Hero's Journey


I think it best to offer some introductory orientation to the approaches I use to help people learn about decision-making. Hence this blog.

The first perspective I want to present is that of the hero’s journey which I have adapted from Christopher Vogler’s
work on the parallel journey of the writer. My friend, Bob Provan, introduced Vogler’s summary to me over 20 years ago when we went out for drinks after seeing a movie. He had gone to a class Vogler taught on an approach to screenwriting.

Given Bob’s natural story-telling ability, he easily dissected the movie we had just seen right in front of me. As he described the hero’s journey, I realized that the hero’s journey was exactly what I was looking for in my study of how people make decisions.

In this blog I show how the milestones of the hero’s journey help organize the outer plot of the story of a decision. In a subsequent blog, I will address the way another movie illustrates the internal path of the decision-maker.

So using
High Noon as an example, let me briefly suggest how the hero’s journey works.

1. The hero is seen in his or her ordinary world. Will Kane (Gary Cooper) and his soon-to-be-wife Amy (Grace Kelly) live in a small, southwestern town called Hadleyville where Will is the outgoing marshal. His replacement is due in tomorrow, Monday.

2. The hero is called to adventure. At 10:40 AM, just after Will and Amy are married by the town judge (in a civil ceremony because she is a Quaker) and ceremoniously seal their "deal" with a kiss, thus enabling Will to take off his marshal's tin star, the telegraph operator brings word that Frank Miller, a convicted murderer, has been pardoned and is due to come back to town on the noon train. His henchmen, Ben Miller, Jack Colby, and Jim Pierce are waiting for Frank to join them. Will and Amy are encouraged to leave town before trouble arrives. Heeding the townspeople’s advice, they drive out of town in their wagon.
3. The hero is reluctant. But Will stops just outside of town, telling his new wife that he must not run from this trouble. Instead, he must return to town and face the trouble bravely, like a man. Amy, naturally, is not happy with this, wondering whether he wants a wife or a widow. When he refuses to change his mind and leave with her, Amy tells Will she is leaving town on the noon train.

4. The hero encounters a wise one. When Will goes looking for help, he finds the judge who just married them. But the judge wants no part of the coming trouble in the “dirty little town in the middle of nowhere.” He reminds Will of the civics lesson of an ancient Greek community that ostracized a tyrant only later to invite him back into the community and watched passively as he killed all of the government. Will is unimpressed.

5. The hero passes through the first threshold. Now the task of raising some deputies goes full swing. Harvey (Lloyd Bridges) is already a deputy. But he and Will argue when Will will not advance Harvey’s ambition to become the next marshal. Harvey accuses Will of a basic jealousy since Harvey claims to be with Mrs. Ramirez (Katy Jurado), Will’s former friend, and as it turns out, Frank Miller’s as well. When Will won’t budge, Harvey quits.

6. The hero encounters tests and helpers. At first a man named Herb volunteers to help. But when Will goes into the bar to tell them he “needs help” and I’ll take all I can get,” it becomes quickly and painfully obvious that these townsmen are not interested. The bartender is giving odds against Will’s stand. When Will goes to see Helen Ramirez, she gets angry at him for not getting out, but understands him when he says he can’t leave. (Mrs. Ramirez later dismisses Harvey as a boy in comparison to the man Will is during this crisis.) In the town, one man, Sam, has his wife answer the door to avoid Will’s request. When he finally goes to the Sunday Church meeting, the parson is reading a passage from Malachi 4 (which begins: ““For behold, the day is coming, burning like an oven, and all the proud, yes, all who do wickedly will be stubble. And the day which is coming shall burn them up,” says the Lord of hosts, “That will leave them neither root nor branch.”). But he does not get any support there, despite a long debate. The final blow comes when an apparently staunch supporter of Will wants Will to leave the town in order to say it.

7. The hero reaches the inner sanctum. At about 11:45 AM, Will goes to see Mark, the former marshal who got Will the position in the first place. Mark asks Will what his death would accomplish. He suggests that Will’s coming back is a form of suicide under the circumstances. While Will is meeting with Mark, Mrs. Kane goes to talk with Mrs. Ramirez. Mrs. Kane wants Mrs. Ramirez to let Will go. She still doesn’t understand why he wants to stay. Mrs. Ramirez tells Mrs. Kane if Will were her man, she would stay. She asks if Mrs. Kane is scared of the sound of guns. Mrs. Kane tells of being there when her father and brother were killed with guns. That’s why she became a Quaker. Having had their talk, both women realize they will be leaving on the same noon train. Mrs. Ramirez offers to let Mrs. Kane wait with her in her room.

8. The hero endures the supreme ordeal. When Will returns from unsuccessfully talking with Mark, Harvey follows him into a stable and tries once more to get him to leave as Will exposes his misgivings. But when Harvey pushes it and starts to fight him when he won’t change his mind, Will wins with a knock out.

9. The hero seizes the sword. The oversight Harvey missed in all of this is put by Mrs. Ramirez succinctly: Will is a man; Harvey still a boy who may never become a man. Moreover, she predicts that when Will dies, the town will die as well. That’s the insight she has supporting her decision to leave. Meanwhile Will gets cleaned up from the fight at a barbershop/funeral home where coffins are being made in the back of the store in anticipation of the coming gun fight.

10. The hero takes the road back. Will returns to his office only to find Herb who backs out at the last moment because he has no stake in this fight. Without saying so, it’s clear Will alone decides he does.

11. The hero experiences a death and a resurrection. Waiting in his office, Will writes his Last Will & Testament. Waiting in the Church, some of the townspeople pray in their pews with their heads down. Waiting in the bar, the men who see Kane’s approach as always hurting business drink. Will watches as Mrs. Kane and Mrs. Ramirez drive off to the train. When the two women arrive at the depot, the train pulls in with Frank Miller on it. The women board the train. Frank and his three men go into town. Will walks down the streets of the empty town alone.

12. The hero returns with the elixir. As Frank and his men come from an opposite direction. Ben Miller’s breaking a glass window to steal a woman’s hat signals Will of their presence. Calling out to them in warning, Will returns fire and shoots down Ben Miller. With the sound of that gunfire, Mrs. Kane runs from the train and into the town to find Ben Miller, and not her husband, dead. Will shoots Colby next, but Will gets caught in a cross-fire with Pierce shooting at him from one direction and Frank from another. When Pierce is shot in the back, Frank discovers it was Mrs. Kane who did the shooting. He sneaks into the office behind and takes her out into the street as a hostage and shield. When she turns on him and pushes away, Frank and Will stand face-to-face. Will kills Frank. The townspeople come out and surround them. Will hugs Mrs. Kane. Takes off his tin star, throws it to the ground. A young boy who wanted to help Will earlier drives their wagon up. Will and Amy Kane drive off without looking back.

© 2007 John Darrouzet

What is your favorite movie and why?

At some point in our lives, we all get asked this question. Our responses may or may not tell a lot about us. Our answers surely change over time.

Below I present my answer.

The movies I picked from are organized in a way that helps me think of better ways to demonstrate how I see decisions being made.

The movies help me answer each question along the way.

Introduction with Examples

a. "High Noon": Example of the Hero's Journey

b. "It's A Wonderful Life": Example of the Decision-Maker's Path

Decision-Maker Path:

Where are we coming from?
1a. "Witness"
1b. "Experiment in Terror"
1c. "The Collector"

Where do we want to go?
2a. "Lawrence of Arabia"
2b. "The Thorn Birds"

2c. "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde"

What are we waiting for?
3a. "Casablanca"
3b. "Hamlet"
3c. "The Birdman of Alcatraz"

What do our wise ones generally advise?
4a. "Bull Durham"
4b. "The Godfather"
4c. "The Magic Flute"

What are the pros and cons of our issue?
5a. "Bourne Identity"
5b. "Manhunter"
5c. "Body Heat"

What do the "Powers That Be" say?
6a. "A Man for All Seasons"
6b. "Rules of the Game"
6c. "The Kiss of the Spider Woman"
6c. "The Gospel According to St. Matthew" (Matthew)

What is our real agenda?
7a. "Citizen Kane"
7b. "Patton"
7c. "Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?"
7d. "Mr. Brooks"
7e. "The Exorcist"

What facts and reasons are we contending with?
8a. "12 Angry Men"
8b. "The Decalogue"
8c. "Seven"
8d. "The Passion of the Christ" (Mark)

What insights and oversights are emerging?
9a. "The Lives of Others"
9b. "House of Games"
9c. "Siddhartha"
9d. "Field of Dreams"

How are we telling the story of our decision?
10a. "Cyrano de Bergerac"
10b. "Children of a lesser god"
10c. "The Last Temptation of Christ
10d. "Jesus of Nazareth" (Luke)

What are we willing to risk to gain what we can only hope for?
11a. "In the Line of Fire"
11b. "The Departed"
11c. "Downfall"
11d. "Schindler's List"

What signals that the decision we discern is the right one?
12a. "Paint Your Wagon"
12b. "The Shawshank Redemption"
12c. "Romero"
12d. "Doctor Zhivago"

Conclusion
c. "The Lord of the Rings"
d. "Chariots of Fire"
e. "Cinderella Man"
f. "The Gospel of John" (John)
g. "Pope John Paul II"

Do you have a "method in your madness" when making decisions?

Throughout my years of work as an attorney, software engineer, and professional writer, I have observed that clients have the greatest difficulty with the single most important thing leaders are supposed to do: make creative decisions.

Usually what they engage themselves in are unexamined processes—not true, not good, and usually not beautiful processes. In short, not sufficient to the task.

They make choices as if they are in some sort of gambling casino, or make judgments as if their brains are plugged into a computer’s infallible algorithm. In effect, they are using choices and judgments as surrogates for the real thing.

To avoid both rash decisions and indecisiveness, they are failing to see that what they lack is a common sense approach to a process that could regularly result in creative decisions.

But what is that?

When a “leader” makes a choice among alternatives prepared by others, the “leader” is at the mercy of the “followers” who are making the proposals. When a “leader” makes a judgment based on evidence and reasons of the past, “the leader” is backing into the future with enormous vulnerability to blind spots. The “leader” is really following.

Ultimately I came to realize that the heart of true leadership is making creative decisions. But since not all “leaders” are creative, on behalf of my clients (and myself, for that matter) several years ago I felt compelled to take a journey to try to answer the following question.

Issue: Do you want to adopt a more creative way to decide issues?

If you initially have a mixed response (a “yes” and “no” at the same time) to the posed question, don’t worry. Not all questions are issues. Issues try to expose a specific dilemma you face, often an apparent contradiction or at least a paradox. Being initially double-minded is a telltale sign of the problem of decision-making itself. What I was looking for, and think I have found, is a single-minded approach.

My journey began when the baseball movie “Bull Durham” first came out. My lawyer friend, Bob Provan, and I went to see it in Kansas City while we were at a boring law conference.

Afterwards, Bob introduced me to Christopher Vogler’s way of analyzing movies. In his book, The Writers Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers, Vogler uses his interpretation of the hero’s journey to show writers how stories are structured.

Given Bob’s natural storytelling ability, he easily dissected the movie we had just seen, right in front of me.

But as he described the hero’s journey, I had one of those “Aha!” moments. I realized that its stages were analogous to the internal process I had experienced when helping my clients make creative decisions.

To demonstrate how Vogler’s approach to heroic structure works, I want you to pick your favorite American movie.

Right now.

While you’re thinking about your movie, I’ll tell you my version of Vogler’s structure of how your movie flows.

Got your movie in mind?

(Be sure to pause at the end of each numbered item to capture a scene in your mind. Words in quotations are meant to indicate metaphorical concepts, not literal ones.)

Okay, here we go.

1. In the beginning of your movie, you see your hero in his or her “ordinary world.”

2. Next, your hero is called to an “adventure.”

3. But your hero is reluctant.

4. Then your hero encounters a wise one who encourages the hero to go forward.

5. So your hero passes through a first threshold, leaving the “ordinary world” behind.

6. Your hero meets “tests and helpers.”

7. Your hero reaches an “inner sanctum” where the hero faces personal questions.

8. Your hero endures “the supreme ordeal.”

9. Your hero seizes “the sword.”

10. Your hero takes “the road back.”

11. Your hero experiences a “death and a resurrection.”

12. Your hero returns to his or her “ordinary world” with the “elixir.”

I hope this worked suggestively, if not perfectly for you. On this blog you can read a blow-by-blow illustration of this journey using the movie “High Noon.”

Do you recognize how the Hero’s Journey, as a mythic structure, may be thought of as having universal application to fiction? Most current American movies employ such a structure.

Of course, early on I realized that I would have to modify it for the purpose of decision-making.

First, to educate leaders about this model without requiring their agreement in advance, I knew my model would have to incorporate questions that pointed to the milestones of the process along the way.

Second, to learn which questions best paralleled the journey of the hero on an internal basis would require me to go on some journeys myself, both fictional and real-life ones.

Over years of study and testing on real clients, I undertook that task and transformed the 12 stages of the hero’s external journey into 12 milestones for the decision-maker’s internal process.


Decision-Maker’s Path™

1. Where are you coming from?

2. Where do you want to go with the issue?

3. What are you waiting for?

4. What are your wise ones generally advising?

5. How are the pros and cons of your issue balancing out?

6. What are the "Powers That Be" saying?

7. What is your real agenda?

8. What facts and reasons are you contending with?

9. What insights and oversights are emerging?

10. How are you going to tell your decision?

11. What are you willing to risk to gain what you can only hope for with your answer?

12. What is signaling you that the decision you discern is the right one?


The moment of creativity in the process comes at milestone 9 on the Decision-Maker’s Path™, a moment that is parallel to item 9 in the Hero’s Journey when the hero seizes the sword.

If you’re interested in having more information about this, on this blog I illustrate the Decision-Maker’s Path™ in my summary of the movie “It’s A Wonderful Life.” I also present a combined analysis of Hero’s Journey and the Decision-Maker’s Path™ in my retelling of the movie “Witness.”

In each of these retellings, there is no creativity if the hero does not seize the sword. Likewise for the Decision-Maker’s Path, it is when the decision-maker sees the emerging insights and oversights that creativity comes into play. When the decision-maker apprehends the insight and appreciates the oversight, the person makes something of them.

But what is being made?

Generally speaking, the person deciding is giving his or her free assent to take a specific future course of action that is presented symbolically in what is apprehended and that answers the issue in question.

Specifically speaking, it comes in “High Noon” when Will Kane apprehends the insight that he will most likely be fighting the bad guys by himself. It comes in “It’s A Wonderful Life” when George Bailey feels strange and apprehends the insight that shines light on his appreciation of the near oversight in shaking Potter’s hand. It comes in “Witness” when Rachel unashamedly reveals her beautiful self to John Book and he lowers his head, realizing he must not fulfill his desire for her so long as neither knows how to bridge their two worlds.

It is when the decision-maker gives his or her assent that he or she becomes valuable, accomplishes the central task of the path’s mission, fulfills the significant purpose, and incarnates the vision presented.

It is at this moment that the person becomes a creative decision-maker. And when that happens, the creative decision-maker becomes the de facto leader.

To see how this plays out in other movies, I work with clients now in customized retreats, selecting from numerous movies ones that depict the various stages and steps.

For example, with "Witness" you have the opportunity to feel the tension between the spiritual and material worlds in the midst of a love affair that tries to bridge the gap, but does not succeed.

Nowhere in the curricula of my era of education was such an approach to decision-making taught. So I had to go way back to basics to find the earliest versions of the “method” I was discovering about creative decision-making. Since I nearly went mad in my search, what I found nearly blew me away.

In Divine Madness: Plato's Case Against Secular Humanism, Joseph Pieper discusses four ways in which Plato observed people "being beside oneself":

1. prophecy

2. catharsis

3. poesy

4. eros.

When I combined Pieper's analysis with Bernard Lonergan's Insight: A Study of Human Understanding, I came to realize that these four “mania” were actually four dimensions of insights received by human beings throughout the ages when they were in the throes of a decision-making process.

Thus, in today's business world, I now see "poesy" to mean creating value. Similarly, "eros" means being possessed by a significant mission. "Catharsis" means processes being healed on and by purpose. And "prophecy" means having a vision of where the creative decision-making leader wants us to follow.

I began to see their impact on the exercise of our most defining freedom we have as human beings: making decisions. I came to see how the transformed Hero’s Journey of the Decision-Maker’s Path™ provided a series of repeatable processing questions, using the four perspectives of value, mission, purpose, and vision to fit the decision-maker’s preferred leadership style.

Thus the proposed Decision-Maker’s Path™ brings the best value to the task. While it is usually observed that people in leadership positions keep their methods of decision-making to themselves based on the concept that knowledge is power, if the Internet has demonstrated anything it is that shared knowledge is more powerful and that transparent methods encourage better decision-making on behalf of the community.

The decision-maker who works within the suggested structure learns the best practices for the mission by repeated passes through the process. While there are few hard and fast rules for creative decision-making, those available are learned more rapidly and honed with more strength than otherwise via this approach.

The proposed Decision-Maker’s Path™ is more attractive to people who want to make changes because its purpose is supported by the storytelling process of the Hero’s Journey. The decision-maker’s character will be recognized in the context of a story told about real life and work.

Finally, the creativity of this approach to decision-making is visionary because it allows its user to bring new light to issues in question each time the process is used. The decision-maker assents to the insight that emerges and sees any oversight in the light of the insight. Because there are as many perspectives as there are people concerned about an issue, the task of the decision-maker, once the insight emerges, is to take the lead, focus the followers on the insight so that they become one behind the course taken.

So now it is your turn. I invite you to take a Hero’s Journey in your creative decision-making process around every issue of importance in your life.

Please contribute your comments on this blog or by contact me.

Thanks.

John Darrouzet

© 2008 John Darrouzet